Archive for the ‘Environmental Economics’ Category

Financial Innovation for Implementing CSR in Small and Medium Enterprises Thursday, November 10th, 2011

This article was originally published in Enterprise Asia’s “The White Book 2011: Best CSR Practices Across Southeast Asia.” Enterprise Asia is a non-governmental organization whose mission is to champion entrepreneurship development across Asia and strive to cultivate a culture of honesty, fairness and corporate social responsibility. For more information on Enterprise Asia and their Asia Responsible Entrepreneurship Awards (AREA), please visit their website.

 

Financial Innovation for Implementing CSR in Small and Medium Enterprises

 

For entrepreneurs with small or medium enterprises (SMEs), it is a challenge to channel excess revenue into any programs that do not see immediate growth returns, so Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs can seem like a luxury not often afforded to SMEs. However, fortunately for entrepreneurs, innovation is an innate characteristic of smaller, more flexible companies. This innovation grants a comparative advantage to SMEs to find alternative funding sources to institute CSR projects and to leverage those benefits to gain investment and grow business.

 

The advantages gained from environmental footprint and social development improvements can directly correlate to operational cost savings, lowered employee turnover and absence costs, and positive public relations marketing value. But another, often overlooked benefit of CSR initiatives, particularly for SME entrepreneurs, is the ability to attract investment and grow business by establishing a track record as an environmentally and socially responsible business.

 

According to a 2009 study by wealth management newswire WealthBriefing, 90% of wealth managers surveyed revealed that their responsible investment (RI) portfolios performed as well or better than other portfolios. The same study identified higher client retention rates for wealth managers who invest in RI portfolios, and it acknowledged a correlation between the entrepreneurial investment community and its targeted interest in RI portfolios.  For SME entrepreneurs, this study indicates the significant potential for drawing higher, longer-term investments by prioritizing CSR as an essential component in business.

 

Yet, SMEs often find it challenging to realize new investor potential because few SMEs have financial surpluses flexible enough to accommodate the upfront costs associated with seeding CSR initiatives. This barrier can be overcome by utilizing a variety of funding sources, including innovative contracting, government incentives and dedicated social enterprise business development and investors.

 

Performance contracting is a popular and growing form of service contracting. Often used in energy efficiency retrofits, it places cost-saving performance risk on the service provider rather than the company purchasing the retrofit. This type of contracting has gained significant traction in North America and Europe, with the Institute for Building Efficiency reporting that revenues from energy service companies using performance contracts to retrofit buildings were $4.1 billion in 2008 and projected to reach $7.1 to $7.3 billion in 2011. Another innovative and increasingly popular plan is a power purchasing agreement (PPA), which reduces the liability of installing and maintaining equipment and is often used for high-tech installments like solar photovoltaic panels (PV). Many other financing options, like lease options and certificates of participation (COP), may be available in growing sustainability markets with low upfront capital and minimized risk for business purchasers.

 

Governments worldwide are realizing the need to reduce upfront costs and financial risks of business to institute socially and environmentally responsible programming. Singapore alone has over 30 government programs promoting sustainability incentives and it provides funding for a wide array of energy efficiency, alternative energy, water efficiency, transportation and other environmental innovation projects. All across Asia, governments, notably including quickly developing India and China, are targeting efficiency and innovation to make their country’s businesses more sustainable. Governmental tax incentives and rebates can be extremely advantageous to a business that is seeking capital to start any CSR programs.

 

Emerging sectors of investors that are interested in socially responsible investing (SRI) can also be central to CSR improvements in a business. Many of these investors can be found through associations and business development organizations that link investors with responsible business opportunities and provide assistance particularly to SMEs interested in green growth and CSR development. Examples of these groups include organizations such as Enterprise Asia, New Ventures, Small Enterprise Assistance Funds (SEAF), and The Association for Sustainable and Responsible Investment in Asia (ASrIA).

 

Many venture capitalists also see opportunity for profitable returns from environmental and social initiatives. For example, in 2010 ZheShang Nuohai Low Carbon Fund raised $32 million “to be China’s first dedicated private equity vehicle focused exclusively on the energy conservation, environmental protection and new energy sectors,” according to a report by the Asian Venture Capital Journal. The Impact Investment Exchange Asia (IIX), based in Singapore and launched in 2010, is an example of a trading platform created to meet the demand of investors reaching social enterprises.

 

While some of these funding opportunities may be non-traditional, the growth of these opportunities shows that there is potential for capital investment in CSR programs. As market innovators, SMEs are well poised to utilize various funding opportunities and turn them into profitable, environmentally beneficial and socially equitable benefits. Additionally, returns on initial CSR efficiency programs can then be converted into seed money for future investments with higher complexity and even greater benefit. With a proven CSR track record, a company can attract even more investments from the burgeoning SRI sector, creating a positive-feedback system of enhanced environmental, social and economic efficiency.

 

 

Laying the Groundwork: Environmental and Resource Economics Friday, December 5th, 2008

 

Environmental thought has developed greatly in the last century from conservation-minded individuals who worked to preserve great land tracts of natural beauty to complex theories involving politics, spirituality, and social justice. One of the most important and apparent ways in which we interact with our environment is how we use it as a factor for production, trade and consumption. In a word, economics. Here I’ll quickly outline the important principles that guide mainstream thought on ‘Environmental and Resource Economics’.

 

Environmental and resource economics are highly developed models based on the principle that environmental resources are treated as market ‘externalities’ that, although utilized as bases of economic production, undervalued or completely unvalued in the market economy. This mis-valuing of such an important factor of production leads to market inefficiencies and market failure. The classic example of such a market failure is exemplified by Garrett Hardin’s ‘Tragedy of the Commons’, (Science, 1968) in which a common pasture is so overgrazed that it is eventually rendered completely unusable to everyone.

 

Environmental and resource economics have developed very useful tools such as optimal depletion techniques, cost-benefit analysis, hedonic pricing, choice modelling and contingent valuation to attempt to determine ecological resources’ market values. Environmental and resource economics also delves into the effects of policy to stimulate better valuation of environmental resources including subsidies, taxation, quotas, and emissions trading. Many of these have proved very successful in solving large-scale problems, such as sulfur dioxide and ozone emissions.

 

However useful this economic modeling has been, many questions still arise and environmental problems, as we know, still exist. How do we determine an actual market value with so many competing interests? Is it possible to measure all the costs and benefits? Can we assume that there is an ‘optimal’ depletion of a natural resource? Will there always be technological substitutes for these resource depletions?

 

‘Ecological Economics’ places a new framework on economic theories by considering where our ecosystem limitations lie as means of supporting human livelihood and production. By building on traditional economic theories without ignoring facts of ecosystem science, it builds new ways of promoting sustainability.